From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git master head build failure? Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:03:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <875z16en2o.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtuih3en.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21633"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 01 15:08:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRx3u-0005Ya-42 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:08:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57842 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRx3t-0006uY-4r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:08:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRwzQ-0002ic-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:57507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRwzN-0007Oc-FT; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6281D4407E1; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:03:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 32412440385; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:03:55 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1617282235; bh=aYaonnfWOd40MQmcRVmt4u0CUiqNlZB4b7IxsEivE7I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kwnbQ+1lzMfN6h/D8iID94ZDrBM7+U0nvtvqBFBEFETS4MZ47GXzLSKJKs+V8uWsO ZSL//p6X83m//To95Qka+GpK2R0Gss9k+7FHo37kPf25dSQ8hrhjJzoGIuw3RAwOy3 XxX+ORObYPlPBdWVrVN8avHtmKHG+z+NlikGP+pnk1qjnOV7cgiiP1MFFXvpSyN+WF 7zALBZ4hGCljHAOIw/yiVwSp6BgedKVvcOW2/gKdnI7GGROzW1/gaGCOfH01jTI9K2 NBK87xX0OgWStJCN6K/cciUr5fDCHU8/y639qqW73pIFoQQSEEs4Nk+NT93wfJmA/H nHlLuP1M7PySA== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A22661201E0; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:03:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83mtuih3en.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 01 Apr 2021 10:25:52 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267253 Archived-At: > This should be added to the 'extraclean' target, IMO (together with > all the other generated files in lisp/cedet). I can never remember which clean target does what (and reading their description has usually not been sufficient to be able to predict which files would remain when I wasn't sure). Luckily I don't think it matters much because I never invoke such targets. But what does matter is what happens when we `make bootstrap`, because this is a much more common need than `make maintainer-clean` or `make extraclean`. Stefan