From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Easy configuration of a site-lisp directory Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:35:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y29cj65y.fsf@posteo.net> <87tujgv7y1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 24 23:50:04 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIeJ1-0005PF-Cl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 23:50:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIeIz-0001t5-Bf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIeII-0001DJ-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIeIG-0007CF-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:49:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D19AB809C6; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:35:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 93A418065C; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:35:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1629840927; bh=U5Arvif0n6kCEA5LpmLmz4QfgtSS3koYqS8+hXXPZP0=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DU/vDBhNuMiCxqLhGET8jzKU36wW3CQrd1brWlW+tX3HXAry4e03BFXkbAWXh+hGd lrVI9FXFQD7TJ/JFv8jFpHlWtRlCo9U5GFMJIXBi4mJBKIaZQleUhG29ND75VS5/C4 ioGZS+jiZyJOEyG34QZUx+h77dQeLlf6du7mdRZpp8cdhOlGXm+DGr+tMPNwDy2gPM FouZT3PXGgd+zda3D8FLzJVEoYuZAnw4p+P+XHB43SpCBQ1lxoWQyCgTWbFoLaACWK 1/TUUY9pYQv3i0UAMVRo4s8rRpRgYX/U8iMopu/quY9DSN9w20yXoytDnZQZ7YePtB /DI5gRzRU3D7w== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40604120403; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:35:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tujgv7y1.fsf@gmail.com> (Max Brieiev's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:14:46 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272927 Archived-At: Max Brieiev [2021-08-23 12:14:46] wrote: > So is there any conclusion in this long thread about preferable setup > for the case described in the original post? And making local git > repositeries be package.el aware. >From my point of view, the "preferable setup" is for someone to spice up `elpa-admin.el` to make it more user-friendly for that use-case. Stefan