From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speeding up the bootstrap build - a quick hack. Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:05:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pmopp4jy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 18 16:35:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9qVj-0002LT-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:35:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9qVi-0000gW-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9p6q-0002XI-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:16658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9p6n-0002rW-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0B5654424F3; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:05:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B53024424F0; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:05:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642514709; bh=UHlYMo+TzW3PishaVlU3K50LCPVH+0i70YXbk6+LxXg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AhZWgILplWO7wj41U4KH4usaCdiK8oUs33gK/3q9zZjYtjQ7svOOCwKVIvNfHvOCo 8vw9MFWMm4cD6DoTCECs0+SLyGgtWgq7ucNDkol7vQVRysmBPflA8P73x7G+5nPua1 P6UV+rLaG3uraRFEf+iinbZ1Z6xQzLcainJVIB6H0LNGQm9N6VuUJqNnOVHlblthVX SDJAytRbYXSvSGliJ0FK0RHJOXRGfaHz78k0I3BzYg4xmRkE9/W0hECJREnV3Wjz/H 6JJZsqe6cJHFSDvZkvQKHRxP5cheRmoQ4jaKNKBPxw39bt5I+ngluCNrm9t7XFW2VV leHtm1t+5C88Q== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DB21120263; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:05:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87pmopp4jy.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:16:33 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284930 Archived-At: > I think this would be far cleaner and less fragile if you used an > order-only prerequisite instead of inventing new suffixes. I can't see how that would work. The current ELC+ELN rules are for `%.elc`, and here we also need those same `.elc` but built with another rule. Stefan