From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f4af1137e6: Bind print-symbols-bare to t in byte-compile-from-buffer Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164295616740.28199.17365289068509535871@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220123164248.CC706C0DA30@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9413"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 23 17:48:58 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBg2z-0002E7-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 17:48:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59282 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBg2z-00041b-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:48:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBg1m-0002yy-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:1126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBg1j-0001eK-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C023F100189; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 505B7100163; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:36 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642956456; bh=36RSuXgbC2wYxgLFHspfkVCGiFd+mJaLCdoRdjX8XZU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QkF5H4e+www5PtwYJuq3xxMd+SbNJ/RAkXqvSD+Js3RIrJKFWLK4lx94knb35zvMU 4fG55yCv9hoOhB35qrc4lNTsB6kPThOkIu/gms6TgRBydoYbqt9DqROJURt+3MVP2k 8Whb4VOIhf4ZCZZuPBgPMM+1Q/y8PKr3gAOAt+edakGwOUPMAbv1zu/Hho0wxQ9lZJ IOXweQc+pGXNSMKt3TewpMU65CRJEsRagnef2rRpnyCLJmXQ7uf9QpgUTHjZvAiaWI g5kSQbvOf4IEFGqJS7PQ4xG5/A4lynh/e5mmOkzGcgoy7RdjwlzLaAUPl1FDViKKpV 74pBj2cBS60Dg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AC5C1204BC; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:47:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20220123164248.CC706C0DA30@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:42:48 -0500 (EST)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285265 Archived-At: > - (let ((print-symbols-bare t)) > + (let ((print-symbols-bare t)) ; Possibly redundant binding. > (macroexpand `(declare-function ,fn ,file ,@args)))) Why do we need this binding here? This is just a `macroexpand`, so it's not expected to print anything at all. What kind of prints are supposed to be affected, and if so, why should it be solved by a let-binding here rather than elsewhere, such as maybe in `macroexpand`? Stefan