From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native compilation on Windows, was Re: Bootstrap Compilation Speed Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 07:54:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878rve85yy.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86a6fu3xb2.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <87tue1j8x0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86wniw3kdq.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83tue0u8sh.fsf@gnu.org> <86sftk3evj.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83o848tc92.fsf@gnu.org> <86o8473k13.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83ee53ssbx.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmo6v741.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83r18m79t9.fsf@gnu.org> <874k5gapec.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86mtj3syg3.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19194"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Corwin Brust , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , chad , Phillip Lord To: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 14:05:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nH3hh-0004hJ-DH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 14:05:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nH3hg-0003Gq-3n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 08:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nH3Xz-0007KC-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 07:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:2657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nH3Xt-0006AQ-0W; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 07:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 97B4E10018C; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 07:54:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B53810009E; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 07:54:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1644238496; bh=3w6IAomOZxzYO4L1AHSSuvZePqzXOJxcrfO4nor4iJY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HbVJ9BO/3XL62qy8KQDUpNdAM6yAIP3QYHyJTzLPfDOpp/V1AJGBCQkX+K1vxLtJl 0/T3Pj+iiHfNK5Zf+t8vmG0urTPN5J1zcFmk+l+/aPQUH3hii4trn9Cav5WoqRpQHT w8Pzm3zQzHzoJ8qoupJbxBW2ZR3g01QEPevA/mScr6tKAi7NECao6mbuqcFZcPlfnh 5rpPTAoNMWKsuN8mz4Yd+ds041pSj9LpNzzmEcx2+MP5qj8CpN00AJI5mpJrq9MzsS vN5xdKnl9lAvoJX3tbL7Jo1o6QkSkCsu81get91RTis9+/O4IKOS2G61Htq0rqiz6C RmI4BolN/QZ4A== Original-Received: from pastel (76-10-138-212.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.138.212]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1C701203E4; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 07:54:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86mtj3syg3.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of "Sun, 06 Feb 2022 18:21:32 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286031 Archived-At: > From a cursory glance I can't see code which might be restricted to > Windows or "w32" systems, except the naming. Just ran the tests of > w32-features.el on: [...] > Please tell me what else do you expect from w32-feature.el, maybe > extensive build information for any platform? :-) Something like that, yes. But mostly change the output such that missing features (or different compilation options) aren't all displayed as scary test errors but with a more informational tone, I guess. Stefan