From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: native compilation units Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:23:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2834"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Andrea Corallo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lynn Winebarger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 14:37:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o15nA-0000Y8-Gm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:37:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49626 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o15n8-000768-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o15Zm-0007RA-NB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o15Zj-0000T4-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B255A80712; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:23:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5FB80802B3; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:23:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1655209391; bh=YVg28fZuzMqL3P3Azm+siiglut/DL76xH1TFuV2YDUI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=X4r46oLZkFVMv0TtlcSzvervfQvIs22H6YNLQ4B33fRctu3YBfo3eVwK9oHW/ZaVE YLBLR5EDxJqWfG5+194wuLY1oNrxK1QS6XndYycY+T8HkIc7AOxzjkt2/s/eZeTu8r KcTuppf6+Ib1dUflx02pfO/Zzdcz2djOe+Ge9C0ikpezHyiqKS2qY4VlXJ7zJIwl/a bF4pqXSak7CSlGAjr1Tm+AeuwguTa/U54KjrSW/+QOs61pEqklMkFbRcKvta1ISaI1 oAWAHaLsMqBbH7DDfIDh8QPN0BVmSOfyHxwswo/iPbDgaLdwisgQoPgeHJZ6xysSYt L+fUYEZ11AfDA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AEDB1201CF; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:23:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lynn Winebarger's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:19:06 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291173 Archived-At: > Or, you could just create a vector with one thunk for each package and > loop through it invoking each one. It wouldn't be as space > efficient, but it would be trivially correct. IIRC the compiler has code to split a bytecode object into two to try and circumvent the 64k limit and it should definitely be applicable here (it's more problematic when it's inside a loop), which is why I think it's a plain bug. Stefan