From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] elpa/meow cee4a34917: Fix a compilation warning in Emacs29 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <167989323517.3717.16516832099659022451@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230327050035.75915C0060F@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16959"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: team-race Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 27 21:39:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pgsgS-0004AH-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 21:39:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgsg9-0004vl-BK; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgsg7-0004sZ-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgsg5-00060Q-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F8541000BE; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A29CD10002A; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1679945926; bh=xdaYLD0oNpYEgpGZYzinh4ZBQJUPdeGwWF+KC5Di1l8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=IwThhM17MXysX8YM3pPuZ5BQUE77QRpQ1ZroGZowJarl6ZRIh+KzJ8+ANpTrnYi+/ QqYHVGowNoPuxKJNDybYW6e8aRpj3ueyn5hExXxeSIJra5iMhiYKftsBcywA8QRmAc /FWQTt1jj0eBVgHRKRG4u0DaTdifUytdhRI8iU37xSgbo1ot5FeWmQ8ueuW4koU3NP dMncghCIRItv0EvpmL7s1K/4Wskp8YfQ2/IPdfzoISYCwsy5y7v35cfsB+UlB2cgaT fDodrqk/uepPIgm2r2y6aKtafrT5KrMebpjUuEPMSV+VskHFq0AYt56tUTEuV2dLOk DlEZWhitukWuQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.34.24]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A6321232A0; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:38:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:23:48 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304790 Archived-At: > My crystal ball suggests this optimization failure is a red-herring and > that the real problem is that you don't `(require 'subr-x)` so > `thread-last` is not defined and the call to `thread-last` is compiled > as if it were a function call rather than a macro call. Hmm... once again I should have waitied to read all my mail before sending this, since the fix was installed soon after (hence before I sent that email). Sorry 'bout that. I guess the only upside is that my crystal ball was right :-) Stefan