From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Debbugs testbed Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:53:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <18375.32881.925479.598407@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080229040138.GU7406@rzlab.ucr.edu> <20080229071618.GJ2110@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204494853 1862 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2008 21:54:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 21:54:13 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 02 22:54:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVw8i-00072f-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:54:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVw8B-0001kv-IX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:54:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVw84-0001io-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVw83-0001iG-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVw83-0001iD-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVw83-0001jC-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:53:55 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAMewykdMCrW2/2dsb2JhbACqdoEA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,435,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15465153" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2008 16:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.181.182]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id IYD71554; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6C3938279; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:53:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080229071618.GJ2110@volo.donarmstrong.com> (Don Armstrong's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:16:18 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91107 Archived-At: >> Yes, that would be good. I've used the "index packages" command, but >> it would make sense to have it available from the web page as well. > I've renabled it. (I used the default apache configuration which > denies it from most hosts.) Thank you. > So bugs of severity > than a certain level are release critical; you > can indicate whether a bug is fixed or not in a particular version > using the version tracking. [That is, you would either close the bug > with a Version pseudoheader, or use fixed foobug fooversion; in a > command to control.] Makes sense. > Then, assuming the BTS knows what version of the 22 series 23.1 is a > decendant of, bugs that are fixed there are automatically marked fixed > in all decendants of that version, but are still marked buggy all > decendants of an unfixed version (and unknown in all other versions.) > [It may be worthwhile to tie this to VCS versions, but the code to do > that integration isn't there.[1]] How can we tell Debbugs about the version-graph? >> >> I'm presuming now if I send my previous reports using >> >> report-emacs-bug that they will end up in the database. Is that >> >> right? >> I believe this is not yet the case. Don? > AFAICT, that's not yet the case. It's basically waiting for one of the > mail administrators to put in the hook to send bugs, or for me to do > it manually. Have you heard from the mail administrators? Maybe we can do it manually for now? Stefan