From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#14170: 24.3; linum won't create all overlays after a folding Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:07:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365606433 16115 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2013 15:07:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 17:07:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPwc9-0007Wf-PE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:07:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPwc8-0006Q4-W7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPwc5-0006Ps-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPwc4-0007eh-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:18494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPwc4-0007ed-D3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:07:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxIEd/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxIEd/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="7084376" Original-Received: from 69-196-129-29.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.129.29]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Apr 2013 11:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E65D567898; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:07:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:51:59 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158820 Archived-At: >> nlinum works correctly. > This is the answer to most recent bug reports involving linum, as I > recall. Will nlinum replace linum at some point? I'm leaning this way, now, yes. I know it breaks some customizations discussed on the EmacsWiki, but I think we should install nlinum.el and move linum.el to obsolete. Maybe even do it the outline way (i.e. rename linum.el to olinum.el and rename nlinum.el to linum.el). Stefan