From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving browsing and discoverability in the Packages Menu Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:57:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r3rhoexe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87twwdm40x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pp70dic3.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429495099 8961 80.91.229.3 (20 Apr 2015 01:58:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alexis , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: raman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 20 03:58:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yk0yP-0005QU-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yk0yO-0004It-Ie for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yk0yK-0004Id-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yk0yF-0002G0-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:59938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yk0yF-0002Fn-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t3K1vvWW008985; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:57:57 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1A643282C; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:57:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (raman@google.com's message of "Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:14:03 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5281=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5281> : inlines <2753> : streams <1425361> : uri <1910927> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185685 Archived-At: > transitively hiding dependencies of uninteresting packages is harder -- I'm talking about the reverse: hiding packages that depend on FOO, rather than hiding dependencies of FOO. Stefan