From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When was a change installed? Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:37:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lhd79a21.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440111329 13467 80.91.229.3 (20 Aug 2015 22:55:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 21 00:55:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSYjp-000287-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:55:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37609 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSYjo-00068f-Fi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSFjG-0002ox-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSFjG-0006nR-2f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:15127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZSFj8-0006mo-Sg; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:37:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A7FgA731xV/5P+d0tcgxCEAoVVwwgDBAICgTw8EQEBAQEBAQGBCkEFg10BAQMBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiDcIzyMBAQEHAgEfizqFBQeELQEEsz+BRSOEFCKCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0A7FgA731xV/5P+d0tcgxCEAoVVwwgDBAICgTw8EQEBAQEBAQGBCkEFg10BAQMBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiDcIzyMBAQEHAgEfizqFBQeELQEEsz+BRSOEFCKCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="160778624" Original-Received: from 75-119-254-147.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.254.147]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2015 22:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 33752622BA; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:37:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:18:07 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188983 Archived-At: > Thus I propose that SPC adjacent to some other whitespace character > should match only a single space. In particular C-j SPC should match > only newline space, and SPC SPC should match only space space. > What do people think of that? Sounds good to me, Stefan "who doesn't much like lax whitespace search"