From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Line height issues with display-line-number-mode Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 15:03:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6fd496f0-7dd5-6c0e-5121-b618e7dca831@gmail.com> <83sgtqi02k.fsf@gnu.org> <83r29ahyz2.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnouhwxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83ef59igzc.fsf@gnu.org> <83tve5ghyd.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnoshn0v.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfzghljv.fsf@gnu.org> <83imukhjdy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="226013"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 08 21:03:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hORr2-000wfF-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 21:03:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hORr0-0003rq-P4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 15:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hORqu-0003r9-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 15:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hORqs-0006kB-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 15:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51510 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hORqq-0006hd-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 15:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hORqp-000wQ6-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 21:03:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:wvMtb3SlmpjbShDxAqRblpEfRWo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236313 Archived-At: > Will it? the line numbers on those lines will be "squashed" as well, > right? Right, just like they are in linum-mode and nlinum-mode, and noone has been bothered by it so far: I think it's much better than the current behavior of "blowing up" the line to full-height. And I can't think of a behavior that's clearly better for those use cases (some users may prefer making the number smaller or removing it altogether, but it's not clearly better in general). IOW, I think it would be a better default behavior. Stefan