From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20201119104035.GB6259@ACM> <9aacff47-8ac2-93a2-5112-6153ee986b57@gmx.at> <20201120210005.GA1034@ACM> <20201121102751.GA11643@ACM> <18a901b8-3250-b461-eb2a-c13988616e93@gmx.at> <20201121124550.GB11643@ACM> <535bd6d4-3997-2e64-ea43-5de6f0892062@gmx.at> <20201122105947.GA5912@ACM> <20201122171152.GE5912@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40199"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: martin rudalics , enometh@meer.net, Eli Zaretskii , Andrii Kolomoiets , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 20:59:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kgvW4-000AJ1-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:59:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35148 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgvW3-000848-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgvV5-0007cj-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgvV3-0001Q6-Lp; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:18 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CFCA10022E; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDA8D10001F; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:14 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1606075094; bh=Uv05vWpIMMygFSU3R6bwwcaI/vAJDOv0K7Xy51Z4k3s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dEOnJilpnsyljOrN1J3WEtOSDu3pQlXmheuhNAJB+iqoC8KL+3RScfbvf+xWoQT9Y JsFPz4TgTHAvKJd0GGqIouPms5MFX+kfFlow6s5raBXbeVuqyjml4V2GonKFYGukqr twltsIdkHswbrl/bPwmqpzsJcdk6Q3AMdTtE6RFo+0qNMAWeI+EDlU/Hpo5eI+f/0O wz4wJTSLJiu0ITMgVr1n/eU922M8MBeNXjpotlnun1XEvkRaPPIMagNCM83IwEA//6 xOCqRbIo3RqPQiic31+sQLNIjFb7zaSyroMQVoVJ2D18AyHs6gxYD90jluGRQ6YYYU gSO+bt58/LB9A== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CC4E1202C2; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:58:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20201122171152.GE5912@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:11:52 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259646 Archived-At: >> Agreed. I think we should more narrowly taylor-make it for the problem >> at hand: i.e. when signaling an error, remember the selected-frame >> somewhere before doing the longjmp, and then when emitting the error >> message make use of that remembered selected-frame to choose which >> miniwindow to use for the message. > > Er, I think you're talking about the patch I committed on Thursday, not > the proposed one I sent to Martin. Hmm... like King Crimson said: confusion will be my epitaph, Stefan