From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to measure frame rate in fps? Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:10:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83h7ih24kc.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2btzlui.fsf@gnu.org> <4fe7f7a7-7c23-25fc-2d59-f1290436f487@yandex.ru> <83sg21zjg0.fsf@gnu.org> <472fab69-c072-74d4-e8d2-0dcefab7f726@yandex.ru> <834kehyp6s.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8cjikuj.fsf@gnu.org> <838s3ni2z9.fsf@gnu.org> <1fe36d16-202a-9c00-7a17-946226ad8e0f@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24973"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , wyuenho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 06 20:11:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpxEo-0006Jo-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 20:11:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpxEn-00028W-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpxE3-0001AR-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpxDz-00068G-Ri; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1396380240; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 14:10:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BA97480497; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 14:10:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1623003012; bh=shIGeMqKzsJ7ni046mVpEyS2mUjfPQ7bTr9CtTs8tKQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=N7gnkdcPBMMRFUnCk2d4E6EtFgbJW8CKt/mtIUUrU4J4K2sTMYNjm49Pl3NRHU40a vdZldCanZIvqyN73ySvzCvOJwszC7g8nzobZ44Q2uMMi3EK2oHyBpa/67UUXb5gi4f 0J3uWGeVmR7RypvDKcuuwU+ilZnlgRknY7R1/kUnoHl+5Xub0wMegTo+N13zI7+w+x U+nT6Uz0Nj1xFk6tB3fm8iKsJRf9bcvC4Nl1CDqMGgp9O2P6styz7a+i63iokyKlT6 qfM8TUaAU5ZjbXss2MAdIwD5k8fVeBBMrvMi0bkStISAkTXGanKFTAKqXlaQ2KTPH7 yZm6KJgH8a0ow== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-196-163-239.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.163.239]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76DE8120E26; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 14:10:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1fe36d16-202a-9c00-7a17-946226ad8e0f@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 6 Jun 2021 19:48:17 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270492 Archived-At: > So if there is some caching of the toolbar contents, I don't see why it > wouldn't work. I'm also not sure how rendering it can take 10-15 extra > milliseconds, but for all I know this could be normal. Maybe we could get a better picture of what's going on by comparing profiles with and without toolbar. But I suspect that the various between profiles is large enough without any configuration changes that we'd need to compare like 10 profiles with toolbar against 10 profiles without toolbar before we can start to (maybe) see a pattern emerge. Stefan