From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: *-loaddefs.el files are not byte-compiled after being regenerated Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:41:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83a68k2btw.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8r8dk6n.fsf@gnus.org> <834jys2ai2.fsf@gnu.org> <87edxvd4ru.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26463"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 05 00:42:34 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJjY1-0006fl-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:42:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37008 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJjY0-0005cz-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJjX6-0004si-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:41:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:30898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJjX4-0007qG-Bi; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:41:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0761E80012; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:41:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6BB7380172; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:41:30 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1659652890; bh=5SqERXhcXkgWJMUDzGK45M+sAQkPZ9u3/zR27+FDwwI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WWXsb4b1oMha1b353Mur+9nb9Jthu4i6WmKhBpa0D3PZBvTK/Ad3wJs3lwae4THuH iltxP0XSpaHSgaMbTqTIWCcX9DhgzcIxBhm/5QCs3p60kN0jFohYmW3Q/DaqDb/2b6 y5Kekx0k8o+I9iMQe5RLF2x1Wp4HdUkcdMNDEKOkkIRJIO8xjg66mtLFHECnJHThAA OkrhKZhxEFp0a5MLevqV3nsmDp656oOlaPdk3y7y1q3WrlGui8P52/uchB6PzjgBBk gCSOvz7B5mrSdYDZvYocXG516SPS/3eQ+7ktgegHaoSt+Zi41mC2KQY31WeGsD1afg u+04yjA0we02A== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [46.44.221.102]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FA9F1203BC; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:41:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87edxvd4ru.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:26:29 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293092 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-08-05 00:26:29] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> Why do we compile those? I thought we only wanted to compile >> `lisp/loaddefs.el`. > > To make > > ;;;###foo-autoload > (progn > (defun foo () > (here's a big bunch of code))) > > byte-compiled. Ah, I thought the change was only about the handling of docstrings for `etc/DOC`, but indeed there are other benefits to byte-compiling loaddefs files. Not sure they're important enough, tho (we still don't compile ELPA packages's autoloads, IIUC). Stefan