From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug of display-table & make-glyph-code Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:34:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200708271732.22306.zslevin@gmail.com> <46DD9F41.8090700@gmx.at> <46DE63EE.3070509@gmx.at> <87wsv4fvav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <46DFC3AE.3020009@gmx.at> <46E0136F.6080602@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189110860 23133 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2007 20:34:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 20:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 22:34:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITO3K-0004BT-76 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:34:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITO3I-0007PP-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITO3E-0007NU-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITO3E-0007LI-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITO3D-0007L4-RO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from x-132-204-254-9.xtpr.umontreal.ca ([132.204.254.9] helo=ceviche.home) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITO39-0000Pq-KS; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 65C15B40D9; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:34:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <46E0136F.6080602@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu\, 06 Sep 2007 16\:49\:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78028 Archived-At: > Aren't all your windows dedicated, thus it wouldn't make any difference > for you? I wasn't talking about my own case. > For other users, a dedicated window might express some kind of desire to > not have Emacs touch that window if possible. Personally, I have no > preferences here. I'd just wanted to propose the OP a way to get his old > behavior back. I understand. But I'd just want a clearer explanation about why that would be a better choice in general (or even in his particular case). >> I'm experimenting with a feature that marks some frames as "balanced" such >> that any window-creation/deletion or frame resizing causes the windows to be >> rebalanced with balance-windows or balance-windows-area. In such >> a situation, whether "| a | b |" is split as "|a|c| b |" or as "| a |c|b|" >> doesn't matter that much, since that'll be rebalanced to something visually >> identical anyway. > Would this clash with `temp-buffer-resize-mode'? I don't think it's incompatible. It may require extra code to handle it well, of course. Stefan