From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#1853: Trouble with gzipped info files on Windows Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232428246 2839 80.91.229.12 (20 Jan 2009 05:10:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 1853@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 20 06:11:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LP8tw-0006nq-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:11:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LP8sf-0003ZO-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LP8sb-0003ZJ-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LP8sZ-0003Wn-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54268 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LP8sY-0003Wg-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:47891) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LP8sY-0002C0-44; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-174.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.174]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n0K5AixS004272; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7E7301C167; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:10:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:11:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3192=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108009 Archived-At: > the kludge being that this only works because of the specific order > files are loaded at dump time and the order of function invocation > during startup. Are we okay with making non-trivial changes in that > at this time? I guess it's better to make a simpler local change, and add a big fat comment about what should be done instead. Stefan