From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Language identification Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87skfczqc8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y6p45n4m.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87vdk7tfza.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251559713 30638 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2009 15:28:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, rms@gnu.org, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 29 17:28:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MhPqq-000754-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:28:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhPqp-0001Jf-AK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhPqj-0001JQ-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MhPqf-0001J7-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41709 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MhPqf-0001J4-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:30829) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MhPqd-0006zn-KG; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmYFAKPlmEpFpYuS/2dsb2JhbACBU9R2hBoFh2g X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,296,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="44485681" Original-Received: from 69-165-139-146.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.139.146]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2009 11:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C2191B40F3; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87vdk7tfza.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:13:13 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114836 Archived-At: >> Is there a reason why users don't use the existing reliable mechanism? > Many of the authors don't use Emacs, is my guess. You mean they're still using `ed'? Boggles the mind! Stefan