From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lisp mode syntax table Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:19:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392682775 25344 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 00:19:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 01:19:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFYPW-0000Ew-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 01:19:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFYPV-0005W8-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:19:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFYPL-0005T8-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:19:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFYPA-0007wl-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:40546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFYPA-0007wh-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:19:20 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/lO/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd/lO/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="47908488" Original-Received: from 75-119-249-78.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.249.78]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Feb 2014 19:19:19 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B4C07610E9; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:19:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:10:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169729 Archived-At: >> > |rdf|:|someClass| and smartparen can't behave well in this case, >> If it hurts don't do that. Really, it seems like a particularly bad idea. > Usually, I try not to hurt myself too much but you know what it is... > Care to explain why it is such a bad idea? > Sometimes you need case-sensitive symbols > in Lisp, and semantic web (RDF, OWL and so on) is one. Wait, I think I completely misunderstood your problem. You're not talking about Emacs Lisp code but about "other Lisp" code (Common Lisp?), right? In that case |rdf|:|someClass| might be fine, indeed, but in that case also a syntax of "\"" for ?| sounds like the right thing to do (e.g. so that forward-sexp will properly jump over the |)| symbol). > I recently used buffers with lots of symbols of the form > |rdf|:|someClass| and smartparen can't behave well in this case, Might be a problem in smartparen. What does it do that you dislike? Stefan