From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:25:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <5509CC67.5010207@gmx.at> <550A7FFB.7040502@gmx.at> <550BD579.9040804@gmx.at> <550C3335.4070405@gmx.at> <83zj77vh87.fsf@gnu.org> <550C7AD1.4080806@gmx.at> <83egojv02r.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8z6vlyn.fsf@gnu.org> <550D4100.6030500@gmx.at> <83k2yatypj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8z6tnoq.fsf@gnu.org> <831tkitdc8.fsf@gnu.org> <550ECD80.6010005@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427063149 17184 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2015 22:25:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 22 23:25:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZoJJ-0001jp-9H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:25:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZoJI-0006sC-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZoJ2-0006pv-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZoJ1-0000C1-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:14554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZoIw-0000BU-QO; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:25:10 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRFpZgf/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIE6IRjG0BAgECgz4DA4NtBJ5uhHWEWA X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRFpZgf/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOhb4EIgXUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIE6IRjG0BAgECgz4DA4NtBJ5uhHWEWA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="114224354" Original-Received: from 69-165-152-31.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.165.152.31]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Mar 2015 18:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5E1FDAE11F; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:25:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <550ECD80.6010005@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:11:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184130 Archived-At: > One thing that's troubling me is that in pre-redisplay-function > this-command is apparently always nil. Not always. If run during `sit-for' it will have a non-nil this-command, but in the "usual" case, indeed it's run between two commands, so this-command is nil. Stefan