From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 4d3a595: `load-path' should contain only directory names Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20151023135532.11512.53356@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83mvv8wejc.fsf@gnu.org> <86bnboeymw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83wpuadc9k.fsf@gnu.org> <86d1w1ahsy.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <562E2A8A.1030601@yandex.ru> <83wpu9bns4.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3khbhz7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eggg419o.fsf@gnu.org> <834mhc3yu5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445984343 10263 80.91.229.3 (27 Oct 2015 22:19:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 27 23:18:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrCZu-0006pm-6S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:18:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34650 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrCZt-00030U-FG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrCZq-00030O-9P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrCZn-0006z4-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:46 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrCZn-0006yv-0Q; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t9RMIdRQ010767; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:40 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E905EAE28A; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:18:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <834mhc3yu5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:17:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5472=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5472> : inlines <3953> : streams <1528449> : uri <2071498> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192757 Archived-At: > I see nothing wrong with recommending best practices in doc strings. I don't see why "foo/bar" is better than "/foo/bar/", really. So it's not a question of best practice. > We do that all the time. Yes, when one of the options is better (or worse) than the others. This is a different case. Stefan