From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 805204f: Mention what a missing :group does Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 12:51:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160502220326.4853.12688@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462294390 19500 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2016 16:53:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 18:53:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1axdYv-00017N-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 18:52:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdYr-00048H-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:52:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdYX-0003xI-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:52:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdYK-0006Aa-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdYK-00060U-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u43GpoTg003310; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 266C1600E9; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:51:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 02 May 2016 22:03:27 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5661=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5661> : inlines <4752> : streams <1629411> : uri <2202451> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203547 Archived-At: > +Put this customization item in group @var{group}. If this keyword is > +missing from a customization item, it'll be placed in the same group > +as the previous customization item that had a @code{:group} spec (in > +the same file). No: it'll be put in the group that was last *defined* in the current file. Stefan