From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:12:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <5d668ce5-1482-a3d4-c01b-7d996a532567@yandex.ru> <20171130214621.GA22157@ACM> <27985594-3bb4-ce88-8928-2ccfeac13eae@yandex.ru> <20171201154913.GB3840@ACM> <1e542021-e389-cca4-6acd-349efddb2652@yandex.ru> <20171201223529.GG3840@ACM> <4a94ec5c-efdd-50f1-ff4d-277f5f45c2df@yandex.ru> <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> <34abea95-c7f7-e8fa-8407-8c2fd2a4cfe1@yandex.ru> <83y3mkzw1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv2zzv7z.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9nexy48.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512407582 17219 195.159.176.226 (4 Dec 2017 17:13:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:13:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 18:12:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLuIa-00044J-U2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLuIg-0004UJ-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLuIa-0004Ty-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:12:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLuIZ-0006EZ-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pmta11.teksavvy.com ([76.10.157.34]:6598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLuIU-0006Cw-GJ; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:12:50 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2HdGgD6gCVa/7mYWxdcHAEBAQQBAQoBA?= =?us-ascii?q?YM8gVSOLY8TgX2ZFoVFAoU0QxQBAQEBAQEBAQEDaCiFJAEEAXkFCwsNJwcLFBg?= =?us-ascii?q?xii0IqgohAoo3AQEBAQYCASWFUYM/gyuLGQWSBYEVj1KXDol9KIc0mAc2I4FNM?= =?us-ascii?q?hoIMIIfRYMGgWwjilEBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2HdGgD6gCVa/7mYWxdcHAEBAQQBAQoBAYM8gVSOLY8TgX2?= =?us-ascii?q?ZFoVFAoU0QxQBAQEBAQEBAQEDaCiFJAEEAXkFCwsNJwcLFBgxii0IqgohAoo3A?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQYCASWFUYM/gyuLGQWSBYEVj1KXDol9KIc0mAc2I4FNMhoIMIIfRYMGgWw?= =?us-ascii?q?jilEBAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,359,1508817600"; d="scan'208";a="11142647" Original-Received: from unknown (HELO pastel.home) ([23.91.152.185]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2017 12:12:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EC7CD61367; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:12:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83o9nexy48.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:21:27 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 76.10.157.34 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220712 Archived-At: > The code which supports PREV-CHUNK is already in Emacs, so the > question IMO is "why remove it"? ?Which code is that? > If we want to try to get this into > Emacs 26, we should strive to make the code changes minimal, ideally > zero. Once all we are left with are documentation changes, the > feature can land on emacs-26 right now. Zero is not the intention: for the doc changes to be valid, we need to add a few `widen` calls in places like indent-according-to-mode. But I'd be fine keeping the old prog-indentation-context if you want. Stefan