From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pdumper's performance Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 15:30:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9e53f0129e556ee5ac27966124ebc4c0.squirrel@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1536089383 9615 195.159.176.226 (4 Sep 2018 19:29:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:29:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Daniel Colascione" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 04 21:29:39 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fxH16-0002FS-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 21:29:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxH3C-0006wS-R3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 15:31:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxH24-0006vA-KY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 15:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxH21-0000tl-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 15:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxH1z-0000hH-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 15:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from lechazo.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w84JUHIG029852; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: by lechazo.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F1B9B602E2; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:30:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <9e53f0129e556ee5ac27966124ebc4c0.squirrel@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:42:54 -0700") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered SBJ_DRGSX=0.2, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6366=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6366> : inlines <6852> : streams <1797498> : uri <2703084> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:229257 Archived-At: >> letting the collector twiddle the mark bits). But I think this should >> be a separate patch and should apply to all objects rather than only >> the pdump'd ones. > I'm not interested in replicating the cons block structure in the dump > image, especially when separating markbits is the right thing to do > anyway. I'm more concerned about the non-cons non-float objects. Stefan