From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: shell-command+ Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:43:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8736362ex9.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Philip K." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 25 15:46:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kLo3b-0001cV-GJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:46:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57518 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLo3a-0007xj-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLo16-0005mF-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLo13-0008QB-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 12BEC44071E; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:44:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C34B44404A4; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:43:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1601041438; bh=O4ILKhBrzQ0B/Sts8TxKNxPIIJXio9zNOadqQI8wYqI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dFC0o+lxHy/uKlzEeWv8pfPwlDmOQNAopxq95zl72017/3uhJdTziVmkcqVsmPcXi CX7VorYS7JWME/06yVyGxX8uDLwnf/nIVslQJDx38cGDZ8NUxfLNQChu39058laxip eNFVGGgajOM0I/isXK56qrLqC4WmjxyK1xsf6rbc5+bPDi8hfUOlCK/Rb4HwsV5JZJ RXkMOVqoArwsFf9QpVd1y9vfZI8wIsuClPmxoKpym8rujuUcM0Ko/Oe9qIDOxvfVAg wkpMw/4Q/+GGJTWnmYbM9UM6r3ytUroCuIhw2B1AcDD6gR371qwlY4mt0/jnwfpHLT 5up2Xf9f7TDdA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A46361205BE; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:43:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8736362ex9.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip K.'s message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:56:18 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/25 08:39:27 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256427 Archived-At: Hi, > [ I tried to send this message yesterday already, but for some reason it > never appeared in the archive. I'm assuming the fault was on my side, > so I'm resending it again. ] Didn't see it yesterday, but did see this one. > I wanted to submit this package I wrote a while ago. It provides an > interactive command named "shell-command+", that is used in the same way > as one uses shell-command. Sounds good. Do you have a pointer to the code? I don't see your name in the list of people with copyright assignments. Then again, I do see some "Philip K..." but I can't be sure it's indeed you. Did you sign the paperwork already? > It should also be noted, that the file is currently licensed under the > CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication[1] license, which > I'm not sure if it is OK. That's not a problem for us, but we'd change it to GPLv3+ when we add it to GNU ELPA. Not sure if that would be OK with you. Stefan