From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:09:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y2hhri3n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pn2tkfg8.fsf@gnu.org> <871rf7ippu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a6trg6mc.fsf@gnu.org> <87im8f951f.fsf@gnus.org> <83lfdacapo.fsf@gnu.org> <87im8d6q4q.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21585"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 16:13:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxWyN-0005Sm-5H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:13:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxWyM-000670-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:13:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxWuo-0001eP-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxWuh-0004T6-Ut; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E79A38091E; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:09:21 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4638F8021A; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:09:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610032160; bh=z1vtpPz2H4oo1Pux33eTWK4cPqFexjr319MbWJoT9zw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Di4MRrLw5L975Ewt/D1zFbwgAALLxyeJeGue5pJ46OuT5B9js1x+6iTvzzliBZFQ5 1rJupOw+8Z7RwTmCPLO+192aBWse+qZmm4dDtWsf5aaPH4hs9i2bEsYVYPgQ3TE5WU RtpKEk9Qr9F+b9a2t/2nu/CrXhbM98HAMKFJX/7nl6WQlxDzUEyHuF5CMPPWGWNYUU DGZxEBiXCBqThPEDnsSPDPNWaHcMdZ8CNF+ew2q7cDAo19UrpcW9iWy6zf0UxWF7p2 mHb6Yhrb1RIMI42dhrPc/UoDxKCamglr5MtbNb9h2c9244WqzEycv9LsYOgXu2/Nvd cUJbbpoNQ10Sg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2099120154; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:09:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 07 Jan 2021 02:33:42 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262686 Archived-At: > > Maybe there is no discussion *prior* to the change, but if the change > > ends up being controversial, there is pretty much always a discussion > > (long) before the next release. > > Not always. We just had a case where there wasn't. I am simply trying > to ensure that the discussion will happen before the next release. Yes, that's been clear from the beginning. We just disagree, Stefan