From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:01:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 15:19:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKidy-000AAb-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKidx-0007h7-SE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKiMf-0008Aq-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:39182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKiMb-0007Zo-El for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3EC1710023D; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:02:00 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E46E21001D2; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:01:58 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1615557718; bh=Wr7LqXJB6u4PRdkywvSQm19Ku6J6AFtPg3Av1U6dY+Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=U15FUEGLPcgBh53WwjTwSLgN27yAA3vokib2TvnrrNqHiNttGwZCFJTPz5yEKR4+O TqTwLQA5pNTYVkMuKqZ9kBD2/fj2H4gnpPFXra54HUSyFKx8SJovti71115aX/MTjL Y5dqL29lRG4FVWzTmuR31MWEtNnqFouYvO74pXSQVCpPzLYeLwV/+UmC5HeApuFmtD QbaO/FYYTPrR7hunpR69TTlCAgpgr6ufBcBwWNfgN6/xMvlsXunslDelJQHaORmmvO gUlAqVxRc6cZIThw+8yQNSKLkZ8h0HHLRImHpsvmalpvlkYr8TevPZ5XBHk1SgE5WC wodQa1Xewpolg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE5E71201FC; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:01:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:54:49 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266397 Archived-At: >> Indeed (but that one, just like `font-lock-fontify-block`) suffers from >> a heavy heritage so it's messy and misused, so I'd be very happy to >> obsolete it (by replacing it with something simpler and that only caters >> to the relevant cases). > Another question: is font-lock-fontify-region also among the functions you'd > like to obsolete? `font-lock-fontify-region` is an important function internally (it's the one and only function which performs font-locking, fundamentally), so no. Stefan