From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: could matlab-mode be in ELPA or the GNU emacs tree (like auctex and org-mode)? Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:59:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878rxiu323.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87r1b8y66l.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28731"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 22 15:01:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mp9tE-0007BV-HZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:01:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mp9tC-0008K5-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:01:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mp9r8-0006c2-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:63091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mp9r6-0005Xv-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:59:37 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A7550440F4B; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:59:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 14B0B440531; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:59:33 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1637589573; bh=MBrsOiqZed+YybyrJhzWry6eBJ3m4Gm8FbE/e1i7BA8=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DdvCUxvQnF5jRTj3gXPmyqzOshdawIid+Q6CFXQ9AEn+zgWFqG2lbG9yGjy3X6r7x 9UxiEbvOM+R8uocENOqqCf+QMeM6N1ZAsiR4+/XulktOxnGcM4EdQ1ds8TRsEtR6sm tB3C+cL9rp6fSrjhU1rua8lMyL3/w0zGg7GIqsujPzOT1oF0klGkUZxHA03fLr42JB J5QZdjaIui7MERPbVnGkAy4SnfKjYER8XgTsU8M9wm4p7RbJvkjBXHl5rhyKwPwcp1 PE1JD1IZF/AGT7Obwh5Ss+dm6270IMK4TPPVBEcXDMvjqUX8Gw6NZJmMGQXcIA2edD zCpv9EoDFQ7qg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAA1E120983; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:59:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87r1b8y66l.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:56:34 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279913 Archived-At: > Ok, thanks for the clarification RMS. > Anybody else: is this settled, then? If Richard is OK with it, it's good enough for me. Stefan