From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs' C: static inline considered useless nowadays? Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874jw37764.fsf@rfc20.org> <835ygj3rqp.fsf@gnu.org> <877d0y6zex.fsf@rfc20.org> <83ilki1cyo.fsf@gnu.org> <874jw26vht.fsf@rfc20.org> <83h701278i.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgdtyxra.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32787"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: matt@rfc20.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 21:27:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oksFT-0008I3-7m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:27:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53384 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oksFQ-0000ag-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oksAY-0006JT-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oksAW-0003MW-CA; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F394F1000E7; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4D063100197; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1666120944; bh=ksd4Vj/XOVdREur/eofPgeCgSLo3ANnXoJzsR8HGd9A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Y85pJxPRbKNn2k0VQUer5r6PF/knUXMpPZRDyl9HLHpxkjNqRleRmPoVmF84D875X KdO0JH4eMLC4TBjmy/CesuyrRVkE6dY3cQjUSpJ5JU41V0BvjXFNLU2pyiH00R0/iA hOBcbtZ02zi09gMYQM4gesv0uEWUsJIcmkCfzMC8PeriMNTXnD81qIwKe24a25w3Br M7KaeEx7fCtP6WqvM1P2daTNp3enUxX3nvdD6FpxYWDyipYbzhgjDLBCmiIrpG/kyB Kxp66MaioFtqAjpJ4mtbXWxOGFU/kDuTvhqMcadQw917RhmmGgfNfDaf9mfY++Of19 pZTihSTdASPuQ== Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05640120896; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:22:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83zgdtyxra.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:09:13 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298070 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii [2022-10-18 18:09:13] wrote: > Experience shows that we have no idea where it makes a difference. Yet we do go through a fair bit of trouble to force such inlining in `lisp.h` (under the control of `DEFINE_KEY_OPS_AS_MACROS`). Stefan