From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: file-remote-p Date: 28 May 2004 16:47:20 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87n03sjq5z.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085782090 13213 80.91.224.253 (28 May 2004 22:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 00:08:00 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTpWC-0003Gx-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 00:08:00 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTpWB-0002fx-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 00:07:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BToNu-0006Q2-Dh for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BToKS-0005pc-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:51:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BToGi-00054d-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BToGi-00051f-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:47:56 -0400 Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D6DB302CC; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:47:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C71BB8CA23; Fri, 28 May 2004 16:47:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Michael Albinus In-Reply-To: <87n03sjq5z.fsf@gmx.de> Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24101 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24101 > I tend to prefer alternative 2. An implementation of file-remote-p in > Tramp (and maybe other packages I don't know) would be simple. [...] > What do people think about? I obviously completely agree since I pointed out something similar back when file-remote-p was introduced (although I probably wasn't as clear as you were: I just intuited that it wouldn't be flexible enough, although I was thinking of cases like url-handler-mode where file:///foo/bar should be considered local). Stefan