From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: My Emacs unicode 2 crash again when I do some *Replace String (M-%)*, I give the debug informations under gdb in the attachments. Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:33:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20070306063056.GA21948@debian-testing-hy.localdomain> <86zm6q5upr.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <17902.9556.720278.162036@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173749627 17999 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2007 01:33:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 02:33:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQvtT-0002IW-Tc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:33:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvuC-00064B-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvu0-00061A-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvtz-0005y6-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQvty-0005xc-Qi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:34:10 -0500 Original-Received: from tomts25.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.188] helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQvtB-0006PM-W2; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:33:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.55.141.217]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070313013320.LVAQ1521.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AC7A97F6C; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:33:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon\, 12 Mar 2007 23\:50\:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67829 Archived-At: >> > I disagree. -O1 selects optimizations based on how expensive they are >> > at compile time, not on how badly they disrupt debugging. >> Really? Says who? > Says the GCC manual: Oh, you're talking about what "is", I'm talking about what "should be". Otherwise, we agree violently. Stefan