From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229109245 28005 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2008 19:14:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: don@armstrong.com, owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 20:15:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBDTX-0004JP-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:15:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBDSK-0008IK-B6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBDPd-0007LE-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBDPb-0007Jz-0J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37362 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBDPa-0007Jo-NF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:43042) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBDPY-000839-W5; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:53 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-87.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.87]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mBCJBH6E008094; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:11:17 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 303E41C13C; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:10:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:44:35 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3167=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106850 Archived-At: > The bug tracker modifies the Subject lines, which breaks > `rmail-next-same-subject' and `rmail-previous-same-subject'. > I understand why it tries to do that, but perhaps we can find a better > way of signalling important status changes without breaking Rmail? Could you show some examples, to make sure we talk about the same kinds of changes? Stefan