* stack-trace-on-error
@ 2011-01-21 17:04 Stefan Monnier
2011-01-22 0:51 ` stack-trace-on-error Glenn Morris
2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-21 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce
incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete?
Stefan "who just discovered it"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: stack-trace-on-error 2011-01-21 17:04 stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-22 0:51 ` Glenn Morris 2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Glenn Morris @ 2011-01-22 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel Stefan Monnier wrote: > Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce > incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete? No opinion, but it is apparently not entirely the same as debug-on-error: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00208.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error 2011-01-21 17:04 stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier 2011-01-22 0:51 ` stack-trace-on-error Glenn Morris @ 2011-01-26 19:29 ` Tom Tromey 2011-01-27 3:54 ` stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2011-01-26 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete? I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error 2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey @ 2011-01-27 3:54 ` Stefan Monnier 2011-01-27 14:59 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-27 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: emacs-devel Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete? > I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'. Doesn't debug-on-error do the same in such a context? Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: stack-trace-on-error 2011-01-27 3:54 ` stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier @ 2011-01-27 14:59 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2011-01-27 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel Stefan> Any objection to removing stack-trace-on-error (it can't introduce Stefan> incompatibility problems) or at least marking it obsolete? Tom> I have found it handy when debugging `emacs --script'. Stefan> Doesn't debug-on-error do the same in such a context? I don't know, since I've always used stack-trace-on-error. But if so, then that is good enough for me. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-27 14:59 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-01-21 17:04 stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier 2011-01-22 0:51 ` stack-trace-on-error Glenn Morris 2011-01-26 19:29 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey 2011-01-27 3:54 ` stack-trace-on-error Stefan Monnier 2011-01-27 14:59 ` stack-trace-on-error Tom Tromey
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).