From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Idea for C-x v u Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:26:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E08E944.2070202@swipnet.se> <87aad2f1f4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E09F937.7060007@swipnet.se> <87y60ltsti.fsf@wanadoo.es> <4E0ACB65.3070806@online.de> <4E0ADCE9.9010905@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309458967 17827 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2011 18:36:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jan D." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 20:36:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcM5q-0004Na-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:36:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcM5p-0002XC-F9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcL0D-00007N-9P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcL0B-0003Ue-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:37790 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcL0B-0003UU-Mx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:26:07 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAGSwDE5MCqDH/2dsb2JhbABSp1V4iHi/NYYxBJ5OhCs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,453,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="117821402" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.199]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Jun 2011 13:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D50375912D; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:26:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4E0ADCE9.9010905@swipnet.se> (Jan D.'s message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:06:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141264 Archived-At: >> Why not simply remove the key? >> M-x COMMAND is a little bit harder, so no one will do it by mistake as >> easily > This is becoming silly. Actually, not completely. I use a local hack to eliminate the confirmation prompt from revert-buffer in the case that I use M-x revert-buffer rather than a keybinding. Reverting isn't that common a command and "vc-revert" is just as easy to remember as "C-x v u". Stefan