From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fix interactive spec for kill-region Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:02:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351274535 21470 80.91.229.3 (26 Oct 2012 18:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 20:02:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRoEf-0001pi-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:02:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRoEX-0004hU-5t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRoEV-0004hL-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRoEU-0000KA-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:3322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRoEU-0000K5-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:02:10 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu0/O+LFW/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="202928238" Original-Received: from 206-248-177-86.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.177.86]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Oct 2012 14:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6058E5940A; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:02:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:00:15 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154523 Archived-At: > Hmm would doing a require of simple.el fix it? No. We can either live with the incorrect warning, or disable it with `with-no-warnings' (which I dislike), or deploy significant efforts in bytecomp.el to try and make the bye-compiler understand what's going on. I've installed a patch which uses with-no-warnings. Stefan