From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] some reworking of struct window Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <514AD54F.8050309@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363877244 12137 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2013 14:47:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 21 15:47:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UIgmR-0007QV-3T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIgm3-00024B-Hm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIglW-0001LE-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIglU-0000dj-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:64779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIglU-0000de-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:46:48 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxKvA/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxKvA/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="5448999" Original-Received: from 69-196-171-192.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.171.192]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Mar 2013 10:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E760067AC3; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:46:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <514AD54F.8050309@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:39:27 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158029 Archived-At: > As usual, reviews and comments are highly appreciated, especially for the > 'struct window' member which replaces hchild/vchild/buffer (I don't like > too generic 'object', but couldn't think up the better name). I don't like "object" either. I'd *much* prefer "content", "child", or "children". I didn't check the whole patch, but what I looked at seemed just fine, thank you, Stefan