From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bat-mode: Inconsistent fontification. Consider using font-lock-function-name-face Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <3668c95a-d8a0-1e31-c663-297ac684a8f1@secure.kjonigsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="123172"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jostein =?windows-1252?Q?Kj=F8nigsen?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 10 14:49:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7faF-000VwF-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:49:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7faE-0008B2-1E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7fZd-00085g-14 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7fZa-0008Oh-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:5274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7fZW-0008M7-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7DCD6100EA4; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2E36E100D10; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1568119715; bh=j6Lnhpli4BGXD9hrCSNE9e8iETMPf46GC9qrN6Z+UYg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GtWN8tIZ4U4cHMAHCzZNFYCPc1A1Pq/TpqrXIZ07JMveIcgvh/rkOF1PgeVKZuwkr ujHG28+KdCq9iM1ct5MfDkMpZO9elwUk73jL1HG2ZaZdT0nUHODzw6bdfH8Rlf7Sgg EUJDu9yXbDnUgJgFWxI43eQf/hWfI5so0hAKTzShEu8FdPtnmKNweMt4/t0Oi2hZyz vd1pTVgmDrLZZehJDBxT1iIKb1WaZN2COUYp3QDioMiXWk5au2jny6G2tplGINtqea ubvfv4/M3Gs3nGNO3hoK2ot9ZCSMaABFY/ZkcY1d7NWvCsLl33bv4rHeSxwFzulFzz AXY462505WlqQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [108.175.224.31]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFCEE1207EB; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:48:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <3668c95a-d8a0-1e31-c663-297ac684a8f1@secure.kjonigsen.net> ("Jostein \=\?windows-1252\?Q\?Kj\=F8nigsen\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:29:58 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239975 Archived-At: > Again, are there any objectively negative or adverse side-effects of adding > more default-faces which authors can use and users can customize? I think adding a few more standard font-lock faces would be good, indeed. Stefan