From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:26:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200405111623.GB5049@ACM> <20200406121449.GB7100@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="98207"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , eliz@gnu.org, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 07 05:27:05 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLetE-000PQm-7T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 05:27:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40504 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLetD-0006YD-9l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLesj-00064p-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:26:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLesi-0007Ae-O5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLesg-00079R-Ic; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 23:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC67680374; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:26:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D81AD8117E; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:26:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1586229983; bh=Ky27uz3JQZMs+zvbz7zoXlppKarNWegtrUVDwsqIJ/I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kBHyk5daNivBhFXtt0ijaMWmOrGluGqyXT8Vnvb2FKGVVOzlHu6akQOW16YogNniL uhhV2ZDgmuxiCprS2ZftgcODVGVJm0y2/SDKXHKnYKHBJie/6NNWjNiXQgwqpfjx05 9WqIUapR5hsfAV6kRsf7csrYMODlDPfMuoSpvP1vDHaUpyC888ubcbEEGl4vZ7yi5D DL1iOzHs2yrnqRKPy3nU/gkRtjQm/fYcpHNpug/r1usFtcPzejkKYoC33GmeZl88Ln +ksLfb0RTAbcMSNHRqeHMBV1H+zVDrXt6LXb77W9Lvrsv4XwuURUgBPFN+XBGAo0JI gEEb/PSjE3KBA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44E1B120480; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:26:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 06 Apr 2020 22:49:12 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246582 Archived-At: > > Yes, that is what I meant. The "kind of things" is nothing more than > > writing comments in C (etc.) source code. Sooner or later, such a > > comment has a parenthesis in it, and sooner or later (e.g. by M-q), this > > will end up in column 0, > > I am surprised, because that never happens to me. Of course that never happens to you: you're the one who introduced the open-paren-in-column-0 heuristic, so you're clearly biased. > What do you think of such indentation as a solution for this problem. That presumes you have control over the code (and coding conventions). Stefan