From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:19:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20201119104035.GB6259@ACM> <9aacff47-8ac2-93a2-5112-6153ee986b57@gmx.at> <20201120210005.GA1034@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38492"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , enometh@meer.net, Eli Zaretskii , Andrii Kolomoiets , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 21 18:20:23 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kgWYf-0009oI-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:20:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgWYe-0000SR-9J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgWXw-0008QM-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:19:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgWXu-0001Zn-T1; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:19:36 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 18778100279; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:19:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2C2A110022E; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:19:31 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1605979171; bh=Ag65RI0kIuNETKQoazx/IVs5IrajOGYbmQ85I7nMBBw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HMbFdBiTkO3j1W4ljeo5Ona+zHhIzfCpbcjsCjMKDAB5UaLxWTsf8CJQLM74TeYmR BAkW/lffRMKlVwTXFZsA8tvqQ5HcGUQvs84g3fVruWf7fGJzBuVHIDbbehz10gmZ3T LGzP12cuhUYJfwELG60jmYJZfS5TzxN3zYPeJnDwisRC469dh32VrRwoKSk8LTEfPJ Lll90hBCZlHx6hG4uRabUQLLTgj+XW35uvOuWztaOn9qNkAsvcx8M/rszczvwgNIh1 urdbCCJAEIKIoz3SLdFSUqRU25X69qgtASkXJMIe0BUa9zwfPl0/P0e7RFTBs0t4wx 6MBzEDlvu7GGA== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C763012019A; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:19:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:02:15 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259529 Archived-At: > reveals another aspect broken by your change. The values reported by > 'selected-window' and 'select-frame' do not match up any more (unless > our masochistic way or printing frame names hides an important detail). You mean that (selected-frame) != (window-frame)? That's an important invariant to preserve. We've had problems with this for years and I've worked pretty hard to fix them over the years (I've been tempted to remove the `selected_frame` variable and define SELECTED_FRAME on top of `selected_window` instead, but that's proved difficult in the `select-frame` and `select-window` code). Stefan