From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/vertico 5bbddb0 03/48: add while-no-input-ignore-events Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:02:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210405145429.5891.40124@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210405145439.787C5209C7@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <90493293-b944-fb6b-372f-7edded4dd3bd@daniel-mendler.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29728"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Mendler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 05 21:04:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTUWI-0007b2-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 21:04:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTUWH-0001io-5k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTUV0-0001Cg-2K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:02:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:29261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTUUw-00046M-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:02:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1BAFD440A1A; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:02:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C9A6444095D; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:02:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1617649369; bh=zmoZdRNqVWwnJ6ks07bsKTbF7/XJQ2DSWz2it6DCSwc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ixys6PD+sCaSypnMWJm4egsAGxWTtbwWvesgYoOjXXH8o4TFfix0Rt+eUCQHLd1k3 uwkOjzgj4l0rHX1K55HNX336T/4s+PBJhGf2tqfGPXknJ4ZFVOH0EIHPcZO86ae4NC ww9ggKj1BfnwCFcq67Pvkkp5tPPe0dtnZpGu7J/yxMHdKAN/6KK4r8UOH43b38uuVk ARx5EEw60fZSORZbNHs39RBlSejYfaNiBrMT8k7S/K4nYlHRMW13DjVaSXOpkdTkhZ IaefcOMviwZgf7881Y6GK0Le4QmU6lvK1XEwB3zJ+0ZqxMrIgVq1PT0KwJjMAgBFjQ 3IY+ffN3KBFqg== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 368EA120337; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:02:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <90493293-b944-fb6b-372f-7edded4dd3bd@daniel-mendler.de> (Daniel Mendler's message of "Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:02:24 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267432 Archived-At: >> I don't understand why you do that. >> Was the intention to add `selection-request` to `while-no-input-ignore-events`, >> or to remove everything else from it (which is what it does)? >> If so, why? > Icomplete does the same, but I am not sure about all the implications of > this setting. Oh I see. This is bug#38024. Thanks. I just sent a message to that bug, you might like to see what comes out. > Generally the idea is that the expensive candidate recomputation and > expensive sorting (vertico--recompute-candidates) is interruptible, such > that the UI stays responsive. The computation is started again when the next > event comes in. That describes the use of `while-no-input`, which I perfectly understand, but that doesn't explain the `while-no-input-ignore-events` binding around it which will (IIUC) make it abort whenever you focus in/out, for example. Stefan