From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting ready to land native-compilation on master Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:10:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a6q7xtz1.fsf@subst.net> <877dlbxp1j.fsf@subst.net> <87a6q6mssx.fsf@subst.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12806"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jens C. Jensen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 15:11:53 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDOz-0003G6-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDOy-0002pH-Ah for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDNb-0002H2-Q5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDNa-0000mn-3R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A03480658; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:10:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0D10580284; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:10:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1618060224; bh=YzUAQs0beWIgYhu5ME1a1+IGlfqRWbuIleDeHQbMOKs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LsTNfx6HG8ZMazpkfeXAve5Il8ZhrARzmmcchn08OXLHIdKRs+3z3bb3MeXLr+HpX tKAnV9d9GQc1LMZyQ1xLYdky5NClZfgUEwQdNdgR1dSsadhcxBMiA51WHWQqxSQNH1 SoXpmukFb6DeAibhgsF/T1o0bCfrLHw17GkAejTq3LMLUqJAEDRq93r+imU76lF+mo 1CF+WWmq8OqXvYjMtdMSB9BfmE/eFC/vPdT6WbA524qfL50PC90Psxi3R5ATm7C/JJ BnyEZMonFM2Nuyt5Oogai3Z083e7eP7Zb1j5i01EtHMOA+swlWPOxG2W/IWBe3uEDM 0z2HW6JVLaxIw== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D49571207A8; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:10:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87a6q6mssx.fsf@subst.net> (Jens C. Jensen's message of "Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:45:34 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267812 Archived-At: > The problem seems to be the way `highlight-defined.el' determines if > a function is built-in, using `(subrp (indirect-function #'some-function))'. Ah, so it purposefully decided to highlight "builtin" functions differently. Not knowing why this is done (whether a function is implemented in C or in ELisp is an implementation detail, which can change from one version of Emacs to another), it's hard to know what should happen with native-compiled functions. Stefan