From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Back from 28.0.90 to master Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:03:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27240"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 10 14:04:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mvfZk-0006sr-AL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:04:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36338 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvfZj-0004bR-0B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:04:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvfYu-0003qF-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:03:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:18246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvfYr-0006yZ-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:03:43 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EAC31100241; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:03:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 07DA8100084; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:03:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1639141417; bh=7MynyU2g0+viRj5rEQhnMAr0aXh2HRPXp/uNK9Dit0s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=koE4tJ7eK76JhNkjEJyeNvuJFf7T3sXgQBAHeRB723nwfGSPztj1SH7oSnX4T8scA zO6fDch0Pah6wQETPbPq4dHHKxKiviLjx5xNzLsaOOyNyNjxG0Elzd1+fnSfKsNhAx Z/LkU7f1ZhZm/wg4y35FC8ynCJm6TgFyTWFGEOD7Pe1MB8SNWTCukoigBqBuX1kNAj t2A18GxM8tcgP+Oyj75SnI4ZT0mTODQDUWwK4EovTjX0iCZRsM1Hz9Xgyj0vOv7o9P StyFJpXLDCY8wM6pr0IV3sV03Qv9OKSkh0MLAVl+fJF8PETGmWeEpTbXGtm6Wwyd6W zMd69iCSZaobw== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C59AC120AFB; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:03:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez's message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:52:40 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281592 Archived-At: > Going back to master I have encountered the "mode-line" surprise. Why is > the default face for the mode line now variable pitch? It looks ugly to me. Apparently the result is highly dependent on the specific font that ends up being chosen, I suggest you report your experience in more detail (e.g. telling which font is used for normal monospace text, which font is used for the variable-pitch mode-line, and trying to explain what makes it "ugly"). Stefan