From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/package+vc 04c4c578c7 3/4: Allow for packages to be installed directly from VCS Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:04:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <834jw33rmx.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmer0xtz.fsf@posteo.net> <83wn8z2aze.fsf@gnu.org> <878rle1i0k.fsf@posteo.net> <87ilkelc10.fsf@posteo.net> <878rl6syg8.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgdjqcu0.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgdivc3f.fsf@posteo.net> <874jvqv2u3.fsf@posteo.net> <875yg6qtbl.fsf@posteo.net> <83leoubj9p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22258"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Kangas , rms@gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 20:05:05 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opwZN-0005Yw-H7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:05:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opwZ0-0002Ym-G5; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opwYw-0002Ul-Rf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opwYu-0005fU-TG; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:04:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 427E0100048; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDCCE100218; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:04:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1667329472; bh=ukPmdSdXT2ZS9Aa0mkYOTot0dYsY4+JjerH+geXxcxM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=TbXb7qZ0ocStIDV8EN7fIuzb3mjc3O52eeJNm6SdLb74uk5SvCsqFsyBLPq/ii6H1 rmk05esssvsXvMzBCVnHk7MD4aSG7qGpklcGZUToZ7KpDxCLq1nSmUs/68SOGtoyvZ xa1kh9aYJgb+bTtBF04eyckthEbOiRGStUSITNzYQAmHS+cwwXvUtFh9hi8inh6Zl1 8nihwkLRHY+8b//0G0N8OC2YcGjIMFzRe3Re/eBh4vl/zXoy9SoWD1fxvXIbkfpQ1o zO1ADkQEYHjYhtMELamyYh+cug7W5mrQd7NmiPmU+wZsTLNf2wv+DCtCkiU2jYHker IRg23CjCmeN5g== Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADAF0121020; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:04:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83leoubj9p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:51:30 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298971 Archived-At: > I understand Stefan's opinion, but it isn't our policy, at least not > yet, not until and unless we decide to drop support for all the VCSes > except Git. To be clear, I do not advocate to drop support for non-Git VCS. I find that *improving* the support for non-Git VCS (at this time) is ultimately counter-productive. Stefan