From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eglot "inlay hints" landed Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83edqqaf8c.fsf@gnu.org> <2B284D77-97DF-4B3E-89FB-13F0CA93D240@gmail.com> <87356xv65z.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <83fsawriye.fsf@gnu.org> <835ybsr6aa.fsf@gnu.org> <83356wr224.fsf@gnu.org> <87bklktu89.fsf@gmail.com> <83y1oophd0.fsf@gnu.org> <83k008pah3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dalal.chinmay.0101@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dimitri@belopopsky.com, luangruo@yahoo.com To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 20:54:38 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHfp-0009sm-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 20:54:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHf9-0001cF-3V; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHf6-0001Zt-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHf5-000367-46; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1BB6A80793; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC07F800AE; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1677182026; bh=ebOn098r3+Tlvo0Cra7Kf6XBlaMijQJGj5alHTQEwOo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=izffw+Td41p7fyrBP4aVWypWbeQhyC++JsPJQjNMsbkRVRWgX9to/ElHAnhfQIpDV 03FPb+k2qyhinh2z9zRQUKT0Q44mpC7qFQaRI2kP33Kskze1RXlxa7sYxhnpdnbwTz uTBXSUqbBLZvHLuaWJ/p1IcOz9te/pbjiFtNXkT1vCNKyxI7xOB7B5AKlTXdm/msiF W9+LO+Kzd1fDXMzo7q7GbyE8y0e5wVSFE3OLBribqQESKeR9uSrH+DJhiEOIX2Segb jlgiK885k3204b2Is9CQxpkslvHw0EGV2dobvF4nSID6fCuQWlFr1zfieW3/LnpMTC 5UqmYeV8J6owA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.34.24]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8586A123242; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:53:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:39:28 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303717 Archived-At: > See also my last message to Eli, which contains a horrible > patch that nevertheless does more or less achieve those > objectives. Hmm... that patch looks reasonably sane to me (while writing the previous message I hesitated to suggest to delay the actual work to after redisplay so you can coalesce several jit chunks). Which part do you find horrible? Stefan