From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Turning on/off tree-sitter modes Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:26:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86cyipsp94.fsf@gnu.org> <9cd17f8b-f88c-49f6-9024-0b6d297e18ac@gutov.dev> <867c8xsmri.fsf@gnu.org> <566ac897-ea5e-4141-bcb3-306d43c9118a@gutov.dev> <865xohrvfa.fsf@gnu.org> <86wmgwnyle.fsf@gnu.org> <178dfc7f-bc2d-4e3b-8417-a616ccc0eef3@gutov.dev> <86v7wgnxlz.fsf@gnu.org> <01d83ec8-c02b-4806-8764-38dc89a89125@gutov.dev> <86ttbzojho.fsf@gnu.org> <930f5c8e-1481-43a5-8f1d-2c13a98df74f@gutov.dev> <86r072krq5.fsf@gnu.org> <27a62624-387c-4233-b995-170270e26efd@gutov.dev> <86iks245q0.fsf@gnu.org> <86bjxt2avf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26860"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 14:27:43 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tISwI-0006pL-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 14:27:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tISuy-0003CR-Kl; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:26:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tISus-0003C3-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tISuq-00081Z-Mk; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB053100043; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:26:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1733232362; bh=h3AmD/u+AYV90xfdj9THo2krhomv8Vy82LMoOsrv4yo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=nM7815DwPO8aE1bmpuHUOgRoLl9sX/oZsmTrZrp/QVvncO3kORQDWqmMRLUE0sOTr SqdxZhXdqD79fj03eMc+OIYW1or0c8N0Kh0g6lijXjptXkazTuuGm7pZanTtFkPkec ckuHrxMjCx81k9/9GbTmkma5CvFFo/0Y84eJ9y/LFNL8ZdB0LgtBmhYrN6KLoK3G+P FSkR658JA4LKL4MtRCCtyqpHxEEsN7I+HYH8XDIxS4qwisufgA2R4yvoN8kmXLElXQ MbyuptV0EbCWuPK15/Lw1OK9UV8FPg9ELZTbb94Bqosh2oSaRCLmBN2iyb1ye9rT5g MPEp4oPRZ9ePQ== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 262AE10002E; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:26:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (104-195-225-43.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.225.43]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECABC12034C; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 08:26:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86bjxt2avf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2024 14:45:40 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325986 Archived-At: >> Do you have a concrete example? > > cmake-ts-mode, dockerfile-ts-mode, elixir-ts-mode, lua-ts-mode, to > name just a few. Basically any FOO-ts-mode for which we don't have a > corresponding FOO-mode. Let's take the `cmake-ts-mode` as an example, then. I consider it currently broken: emacs -Q foo.cmake should put you in `cmake-ts-mode` when you have the CMake tree-sitter grammar installed, but instead it remains in fundamental-mode. Until this is fixed I don't see any sense in discussing how the users can specify whether they prefer `cmake-mode` or `cmake-ts-mode`. Stefan