From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release of CC Mode 5.31 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:42:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bqzrcjth.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134139507 25235 80.91.229.2 (9 Dec 2005 14:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mast@lysator.liu.se, romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, henrik.enberg@telia.com, acm@muc.de Original-X-From: cc-mode-help-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Fri Dec 09 15:45:04 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkjTn-0002zp-RX for sf-cc-mode-help@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:44:12 +0100 Original-Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net (sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.7]) by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5E5130AC; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:44:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EkjSx-0006Gb-Uq for cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:43:19 -0800 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.44) id 1EkjSw-0001az-0j for cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:43:20 -0800 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkjS9-0002cw-Bp for bug-cc-mode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1EkjUO-00054T-QK for bug-cc-mode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkjUN-000527-Qg; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EACD2CF6CB; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:43:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB704AC013; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:42:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DB7F5E6C1A; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:42:56 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:35:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.853, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.05, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 Original-Sender: cc-mode-help-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: cc-mode-help-admin@lists.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports, feature requests, and general talk about CC Mode. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:42:56 -0500 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general:2786 gmane.emacs.devel:47297 Archived-At: >> While I don't claim that it's a bad reason, I'm not sure it's that much >> better than the reason we're facing which argues to use the other behavior > It's certainly better for when you update Emacs from CVS and then run > "make" to build the new version. Currently, you at least can build > Emacs from C sources before you "make recompile" in the lisp > directory; with the logic you suggest, it might fail due to mixing old > *.elc files with new *.el files. Not if you only use the new behavior during byte-compilation, as I suggest. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click