From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-n and C-a Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bptqywpq.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87skn1fxaw.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233278436 25962 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2009 01:20:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 30 02:21:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSi4r-0007Wm-Nq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:21:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51054 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSi3Z-0005EX-FD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSi3U-0005Cd-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSi3T-0005BV-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47105 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSi3T-0005BO-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:64136 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSi3T-0000hK-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:23 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FABvkgUnO+LLC/2dsb2JhbACBbsk2hBAGgkU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,347,1231131600"; d="scan'208";a="33003905" Original-Received: from 206-248-178-194.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.178.194]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2009 20:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E0CFF7F9B; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87skn1fxaw.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:32:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108383 Archived-At: > word-wrap-mode But this is a misleading name: the issue is not how lines are wrapped but how motion command behave. So visual-line-mode is a much better name in this respect. Stefan