From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: view/edit large files Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:56:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86fxiuw6u7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86zlgzqudo.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <86k583p96e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874oz7grs0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <864oz3nyj8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <864oz2l47t.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234922245 11257 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2009 01:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 18 02:58:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZbhp-0008Fc-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:58:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60226 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZbgU-00004v-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZbgO-0008Vp-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZbgN-0008Vb-60 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56375 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZbgM-0008VX-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:36092 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZbgK-0006BE-V1; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:01 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAET5mklMCpTK/2dsb2JhbACBbtIIhBMGgzU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,225,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="34012604" Original-Received: from 76-10-148-202.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.148.202]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2009 20:57:00 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BD60E8442; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:56:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:47:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109156 Archived-At: > Is off_t guaranteed to be 64-bit wide? If not, we lose the advantage > of the floats, no? I wouldn't worry about it for now. This is just a quick patch, barely tested (I wrote it a while ago, but haven't actually used it). "off_t" is what is used by "lseek", so if it's not enough, we need further changes. In any case, this was a mistake: it was only intended to be sent to Ted. We're in pretest, so we shouldn't waste time on such things. Stefan