From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-lock enhancements Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253637299 6286 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2009 16:34:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 18:34:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mq8KH-0006rR-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:34:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49771 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq8KG-00046s-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq8DY-0001wH-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq8DU-0001uH-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40745 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mq8DT-0001u0-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:43172) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mq8DT-0003BF-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n8MGRhib015742; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 325103A122; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:27:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:08:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3368=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115528 Archived-At: >> I single major mode sounds sufficient. =A0The distinction between the two >> cases could even be done with a global variable, rather than being >> per-buffer. > OK (assuming you mean "single minor mode" :-) Wihch gparted of me answering ist clear? Stefan