From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Frame ordering Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:29:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8F18E079-3351-4398-B76B-6CF9169ACE9E@gmail.com> <4C123889.5060801@gmx.at> <597D28BE-ABE3-4FFF-84B1-1FBF9931293C@gmail.com> <4C126EA5.1050509@gmx.at> <4DF4317D-522E-4948-9C19-ED1252BF36B2@gmail.com> <4C133EDF.8070407@gmx.at> <77C00490-801D-47B9-83BC-32D786F1F684@gmail.com> <1F24A2FE-EF86-4E03-84CF-69748A482C64@gmail.com> <4C15D150.6040006@gmx.at> <4C15E738.10204@gmx.at> <4C15F459.8070506@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276522209 19420 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2010 13:30:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , Emacs-Devel devel , David Reitter To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 15:30:07 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO9jn-0006Ib-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40700 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO9jn-00022m-2h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40250 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO9jg-00022X-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO9jf-000449-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:28157 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO9jf-000442-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:29:55 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAD/LFUxMCoQR/2dsb2JhbACefXK/IIUaBI0Cgxo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,414,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="67988063" Original-Received: from 76-10-132-17.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO alfajor.home) ([76.10.132.17]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2010 09:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 13FD6AE251; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:29:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:28:51 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125904 Archived-At: >> What's not clear to me is: Does (1) the conditional above (raising >> the frame) not transfer the focus or is (2) just the comment wrong >> and the raise_frame is not needed? > The following part is not correct. > /* Under NS, there is no system mechanism for choosing a new > window to get focus -- it is left to application code. > Because Emacs 22.3 Carbon+AppKit port, Emacs 23 Mac port, and so many > other Cocoa applications are using such a mechanism, without explicit > focus switching on the deletion of a window. So we should start by removing this NS-specific #ifdef. Stefan